Svidler, Peter (2690) - Ivanchuk, Vassily (2740)
Dortmund, 07/04/1998

Round 8 [Svidler, P]


1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.O-O Be7 6.Re1 b5 7.Bb3 d6 8.c3 O-O 9.h3



Bb7 10.d4 Re8 11.Ng5 Rf8 12.Nf3 Re8 13.Nbd2 Bf8 14.d5 Nb8 15.Nf1 Nbd7 16.Ng3



Rc8 As far as I know, this is a novelty. 16...g6 and 16...Nc5 were played numerous times before.
17.Nh2 I decided to go for the most standard reply. Other possibility was
[17.a3!? , trying to keep the bishop on the a2-g8 diagonal,]
[while 17.a4 Nc5 18.axb5 axb5 19.Bc2
(19.Ba2 Ra8Unclear position)
19...c6 20.b4 Ncd7
(20...Na4 21.Bxa4 bxa4 22.c4+ / -)
21.dxc6 Rxc6 leads nowhere.]
17...Nc5 18.Bc2 c6 19.dxc6 Bxc6



20.Bg5
[20.Ng4 I liked less on general grounds: in the inevitable (I thought) fight for the d5-square the knight on e3 will be of more use than a bishop.]
20...g6? A highly unusual strategic approach, not likely to be seen again. Black probably wants to keep the h6 square for his bishop in lines like
[20...h6 21.Bxf6 Qxf6 22.Ng4 Qd8 23.Ne3 with a very slight edge.
(23.Nf5 h5! is no good)]
But the remedy turns out to be far worse than the dicease.
21.Ng4 Be7



22.Nh6+ Kf8 Actually the only move.
[22...Kg7 seems to lose by force:
23.Qf3 Ne6 24.Nhf5+ gxf5 25.Nxf5+ Kg6
(25...Kf8 26.Nxe7 Nxg5 27.Qxf6+ -)
26.Bxf6 Bxf6 27.Qg3+ Bg5 28.Rad1!
(28.h4 is also quite good:
28...Rc7 29.Rad1 Rd7 30.Rd2!+ / -)
28...Kf6 29.Rxd6 Qc7 30.h4 Bh6 31.f4!!+ - , and White is finally getting to the king.]
23.Qf3 At first I thought I was winning easily with
[23.Bb3 Ne6
(23...d5 24.Bxf6 Bxf6 25.Bxd5+ / -)
24.h4 , and all I need now is to play Qf3, and Black will never have any moves at all. But then I discovered
24...Ng8 and decided to look for something else. I found it, but it was also possible to look deeper in this line:
25.Qf3
(25.Bxe6 fxe6 26.Qf3+ Kg7 27.Qf7+ Kh8Unclear position)
25...Nxh6
(25...Nxg5 26.hxg5 Nxh6 27.gxh6 f5 28.Nxf5 gxf5 29.Qh5 d5 30.exd5+ -)
26.Bxh6+
(26.Bxe6 Bxg5 27.Bxc8 Bxh4 , and I am not at all sure White is so much better here.)
26...Kg8 27.Nf5



Bxh4
(27...Bf6 28.Nxd6)
28.Ng7! (that's the move I failed to find at the board)
28...Re7 29.Nxe6 Rxe6
(29...fxe6 30.g3+ -)
30.Bxe6 fxe6+ / -]
23...Bd7Only possible move But now White must hurry, since Black wants to play Kg7, and after that it will prove virtually impossible to stop Rf8 and Ng8 with total liberation.
[23...d5 is bad in view of the simple
24.Rad1+ / -]
[and after 23...Ne6 24.h4 successfully stalemates Black again, since
24...Kg7 is always met by
25.Nhf5+]
24.Red1! It is very important to keep the ... a2 pawn protected!



24...Rc6Only possible move
[24...Be6 loses: 25.Ngf5! gxf5 26.exf5 Bd7 (Black would, of course, prefer a2, but it's unavailable)
(26...Bc4 27.b3 Bd5 28.Rxd5 e4 29.Qd1+ / -)
27.Qg3! Ng8
(27...Nce4 28.Bxe4 Nxe4 29.Bxe7+ Kxe7 30.Qh4+ Kf8 (30...Nf6 31.Ng4+ -) 31.Qxe4 Qf6 32.Ng4 Qxf5 33.Qxf5 Bxf5 34.Ne3 Be6 35.Rxd6+ / -)
28.Bxe7+ Nxe7 29.Rxd6 Rc6
(29...Qc7 30.Rf6+ -)
30.Rad1
(30.Qxe5 is also good enough:
30...Ng8 31.Qd5 Nxh6 32.Rxc6+ -)
30...Qc7 31.Qxe5 Ng8 32.Qh8 Rxd6 33.Qxg8+ Ke7 34.Re1++ -]
25.b4! The beginning of a very long tactical idea.
25...Na4 26.Bb3



Be6
[26...Rxc3 is bad: 27.Nxf7 Rxf3 28.Nxd8
(28.Bh6+ Kg8 29.Nxd8+ Rxb3 30.axb3 Rxd8 31.bxa4 bxa4+ / -)
28...Rxb3
(28...Rxd8 29.gxf3 Bxh3 30.Rac1+ -)
29.axb3 Rxd8 30.bxa4 bxa4 31.Bxf6 Bxf6 32.Rxd6 Be7 33.Rd5+ / -]
27.c4!
[Here 27.Bxa4 bxa4 28.Ngf5 does not work:
28...gxf5 29.exf5 e4 30.Qg3 Bc4- +]
27...Bxc4 Played very quickly, while I thought the only move was
[27...Nb2 , and after
28.cxb5 axb5 29.Rdc1 White is a lot better.]
28.Bxa4 bxa4



29.Rac1 Now Black has only two moves.
29...d5 The other one was
[29...Bb5 , but it does not help:
30.Rxc6 Bxc6 31.Nhf5! gxf5 32.Nxf5 Ng8
(32...Nxe4 33.Bh6+ Kg8 34.Rxd6!! Bxd6 35.Qg4+ Ng5 36.Bxg5+ -)
33.Bxe7+ Rxe7
(33...Nxe7 34.Nxd6+ -)
34.Rxd6 Bd7
(34...Qc7 35.Qg3 f6 36.Rxc6 Qxc6 37.Qxg8++ -)
35.Qg4 f6 36.Nxe7 Kxe7 37.Rxd7+ Qxd7 38.Qg7+ Kd6 39.Qxg8+ / -]
30.Nhf5! The point of my combination. But now follows a sequence of shameful mistakes from both sides, seriously spoiling the game.



30...gxf5?
[30...d4 was objectively stronger: after
31.Rxc4 Rxc4 32.Nxe7 Qxe7 33.Bxf6 Qe6 34.Bg5 White is better, but not winning, thou it's better not to play
34...Rxb4? 35.Qa3 Qd6 36.Bd2 Rb6 37.Qxd6+ Rxd6 38.Bb4+ -]
31.Nxf5?? Two blunders at once. I thought this was winning, while it certainly does not, and because of that decided not to check 31.Bh6+, which does. I found the win there two minutes later, but it was alteady too late.



31...Nxe4!
[I was more occupied with lines like
31...Ng8 32.exd5 Bxg5
(32...Rc8 33.Nxe7 Nxe7 34.d6+ -)]
32.Bh6+ A bluff. By this time I realized that after the planned
[32.Bxe7+ Rxe7 33.Qxe4 Black is not forced to play
33...dxe4 34.Rxd8+ Re8 35.Rxe8+ Kxe8 36.Rxc4+ - , but can reply with 33...Re8!!, defending everything at once, and White is simply a pawn down. I also found how I could have won after 31.Bh6+. So I decided to check whether Wassily will find the refutation of 32...Kg8.]
32...Kg8?? And he did not and thus had not played
[32...Rxh6 33.Nxh6 Ng5 , after which White will almost certainly lose.]
33.Rxc4! Now he saw it. He sat there for some ten minutes and then resigned and stormed away. The position is bad, but most of all, I guess, it was intolerable for him to think about 32...Rxh6.
[33.Rxc4 Rxc4



34.Rxd5!! Qc7
(34...Ng5 35.Bxg5 Bxg5 36.Rxd8 Rxd8 37.Qg3 f6 38.h4 Rc1+ 39.Kh2 Rdd1 40.Qg4 h5 41.Qxh5+ -)
(34...Bg5 35.Rxd8 Rxd8 36.Bxg5 Nxg5 37.Qh5 f6 38.Qh6+ / -)
(34...Qc8 35.Nxe7+ Rxe7 36.Qg4+)
35.Nxe7+ Qxe7 36.Qg4+ Ng5 37.Qxc4 Qf6 38.Bxg5 Qxg5 39.Qxa6 Qc1+ 40.Qf1 Qb2 41.Qc4+ -]


1-0

PGN...

Created with PGNtoJS